FAA nears proposal on pilot fatigue rules

WASHINGTON — After a regional airliner crashed in western New York a year and a half ago, killing 50 people, the Obama administration promised swift action to prevent similar tragedies. High on the list: new rules governing the number of hours pilots may work, to prevent tired flight crews from making fatal errors.

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood wrote in June 2009 that the Federal Aviation Administration was in a hurry and would not wait for Congress “to add mandatory layers to airline safety,” nor even for crash investigators to complete their work, “because air passengers deserve action. And, they deserve it now.”

Reposition yourself for great deals

Travelers ready for a voyage on the high seas can book a cruise without sinking their savings accounts. It’s reposition season, meaning you can find deals for as tiny as $35 per day. Full story

Readers share funny pics from their travels Travelers on board for paperless boarding Tourism showing signs of life in the Big Easy A heavy footprint on national parks

It’s taken 15 months and a half-dozen missed deadlines, but the FAA is finally about to propose new regulations on how many hours airlines can schedule pilots to be on duty or in the cockpit. A draft was submitted to the White House Office of Management and Budget for review last week, and a proposed rule is likely to be published within days, industry officials said. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to address the issue publicly. A House hearing on the proposal is scheduled for next week.

Even when the new rules are proposed, it will likely be months — possibly even a year or longer — before they take effect. Pilot unions and relatives of crash victims who have been campaigning for the new rules stated they are troubled by the lengthy process when safety is at stake.

“You cannot be anything but concerned about the delays. This is supposedly (Federal Aviation Administration chief) Randy Babbitt’s No. 1 priority and something there has been a crying need for decades now,” stated Kevin Kuwik, a spokesman for relatives of the victims of Continental Connection Flight 3407, which crashed near Buffalo in February 2009. An NTSB investigation found that both pilots on the flight were probably suffering from fatigue, even though fatigue was not a direct cause of the accident.

At a private meeting with White House officials in June, relatives were assured the issue is a priority, he said.

Transportation and FAA officials declined to discuss the reason for the delays. Transportation Department spokeswoman Olivia Alair stated only, “We are working as quickly as possible to get the proposal out for comment.”

Safety benefits Lawmakers, industry officials and union leaders familiar with the process state the difficulty is in demonstrating that the safety benefits of stricter rules on flight hours — lives saved and injuries avoided — would outweigh the cost of the rules to the struggling airline industry. Depending upon how they are written, new regulations could cost industry billions of dollars over the next decade.

The result, these insiders say, has been a monthslong back-and-forth between the government and industry.

Officials at airline trade associations state they have not been lobbying to block or delay new regulations. But the cost estimates the airline industry has supplied the government amount to a kind of lobbying, stated Rep. James Oberstar, D-Minn., chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.

“I know for sure they are using the rule-making process to make their case,” stated Oberstar, who has talked privately with Babbitt about the situation. He stated one reason for the delay is that the FAA has been trying to “bulletproof” the proposal against possible challenges.

“The companies do not want any change that will cost them 10 cents,” Oberstar said. “That’s what it all comes down to.”

Tom Hendricks, vice president for the Air Transport Association, an organization of major air carriers, stated he hasn’t seen either a draft proposal or cost estimates from the FAA. But he said, “We’re always very concerned about added costs without a demonstrable safety benefit.”

Current rules state pilots can be scheduled for up to 16 hours on duty — which means being at work, ready to fly — and up to eight hours of actual flight time in a 24-hour period, with a minimum of eight hours for rest in between. The rules do not take into account that it can be more tiring for regional airline pilots to fly five or six short legs in six hours than it is for a pilot with a major airline to fly eight hours across the Atlantic to Europe, say, with only one takeoff and landing. Takeoffs and landings are usually the most strenuous part of flying.

The rules also do not take into account pilots whose schedules put them in the cockpit during the period, typically 2 a.m. to 6 a.m., when people are more likely to become fatigued than if they were awake the same number of hours during the daytime. Cargo airlines — especially overnight package services — do much of their flying during those hours.

Updated 32 minutes ago Huge blast destroys dozens of homes near San Francisco Quran burning on again? Pastor states maybe Judge: Military’s gay ban is unconstitutional Quran-burning pastor in confused shambles Explosion sparks big fire

Related News:

Details :
Submited at Friday, September 10th, 2010 at 10:00 am on News by samantha
Comment RSS 2.0 - leave a comment - trackback

Leave Comment Here...